I have a huge fear of spiders. I have
identified as an arachnophobe ever since this enormous spider bit my ankle when
I went camping with my dad when I was six-years-old. This event established my
fear and hatred for spiders, and so when Edmund Wilson wrote in his review of Lord
of the Rings that the monsters in the novel weren’t “scary”, I
understandably felt upset and angry about this comment. Obviously, I may be
biased when I say that the Mirkwood spiders in The Hobbit and Shelob in Lord
of the Rings are horrifying monsters that young children should be afraid
of, but even people who do not have arachnophobia would still claim to dislike
spiders for many reasons. Even Tolkien himself sees how scary spiders can be,
which may explain why Shelob, or even the Mirkwood spiders, are presented as frightening,
threatening creatures Sam and Bilbo must overcome.
Seeing as spiders are animals that people
naturally fear, it only makes sense that Tolkien feature giant versions of them
in his novels. Tolkien could easily have just described the spiders in The
Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings as “giant spiders” that the
protagonist of each story must defeat. However, in both books, Tolkien goes a
step further by using as much vivid detail as possible when describing the
spiders because he not only wants to help his readers visualize just how
frightening they look, but also give each novel’s protagonist a giant obstacle
they must overcome to reach their goals. For example, in The Two Towers,
Tolkien describes Shelob’s appearance by writing, “But still, she was there,
who was there before Sauron, and before the first stone of Barad-dûr; and she
served none but herself, drinking the blood of Elves and Men, bloated and grown
fat with endless brooding on her feasts, weaving webs of shadow; for all living
things were her food, and her vomit darkness” (Tolkien 707).
Beyond the scary detail Tolkien used to
described Shelob and the other spiders in Middle Earth, what always scared me
about the spiders when I was younger was how conniving and sadistic the spiders
were. For example, when Bilbo first encounters the Mirkwood spiders while
trying to free the dwarves who were caught in the spiders’ webs in The
Hobbit, Tolkien writes, “…these loathsome creatures were speaking one to
another. Their voices were a sort of thin creaking and hissing, but he could
make out many of the words that they said. They were talking about the
dwarves!” (Tolkien 194). Tolkien’s description showcases that the spiders are
not just mindless monsters who are solely focused on wreaking havoc on the main
protagonists, but intelligent creatures who have their own personalities. It
would have been easy for Tolkien to simply have the giant spiders be dumb,
dangerous creatures, and this would have been enough of an obstacle for Bilbo
and company to triumph over. By having his spiders be intelligent creatures who
have human qualities such as language, Tolkien’s spiders not only become more
fleshed-out beings, but also much more dangerous threats that the protagonists
must prevail over.
Even Shelob, who does not seem to speak in
The Two Towers, is still an intelligent being who is capable of
independent thoughts. Described as someone Gollum “bowed and worshipped”
(Tolkien 707), Tolkien states, “Little she knew of or cared for towers, or
rings, or anything devised by mind or hand, who only desired death for all others,
mind and body, and for herself a glut of life, alone, swollen till the
mountains could no longer hold her up and the darkness could not contain her”
(Tolkien 707). From this passage, Tolkien showcases that Shelob has no
allegiance to Sauron and his cause of getting the One Ring back because she
could care less about Sauron’s goals. She seems entirely uninterested with the
War of the Ring because, to Shelob, it does not matter whether the ring is
destroyed or not. Shelob has her own independent goal: continuing to find prey
to feed on. Shelob’s independence from the main conflict of The Lord of the
Rings is, in my opinion, what makes her so much more frightening because
she is different from the other antagonists in the novel. Shelob is not like
the primary villains like Sauron and Saruman in which they are primarily
motivated in getting back the One Ring. She, instead, is only driven by her
carnal desire to feed on those who dare enter her lair, regardless if they have
the One Ring, which is ultimately what makes her such a terrifying entity.
With such vivid descriptions of the
spiders’ physicality and personality, I always believed that Tolkien must have
feared spiders himself, especially since he was bitten by one when he was
younger. However, when reading Letter 163 in The Letters of JRR Tolkien,
Tolkien seems to be indifferent towards them since he writes, “And if that has
anything to do with my being stung by a tarantula when a small child, people
are welcome to the notion (supposing the improbable, that any one is
interested). I can only say that I remember nothing about it, should not know
it if I had not been told; and I do not dislike spiders particularly, and have
no urge to kill them. I usually rescue those whom I find in the bath!”
(Carpenter 217). Therefore, while Tolkien himself may not have had any hatred
toward spiders, perhaps there was something in his subconscious that would make
him think of spiders when attempting to create of a creature of horror for his
stories. As an arachnophobe, he certainly created the ultimate creature of
horror for me as a child.
Overall, whether Tolkien had some hidden
dislike for spiders or if it were simply to scare his children, I think most
people would agree that spiders are a good creature to add to stories like
these. Some may love them, but most people like myself think they are horrible monsters
that have too many legs and are out to get us in our sleep. Regardless,
whatever the reason may be for the inclusion of spiders like Shelob or however
readers like myself may react to them, we must become like the protagonists in The
Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings and triumph over them. As Tolkien
wrote in The Hobbit after Bilbo killed his first spider, “He felt a
different person, and much fiercer and bolder in spite of an empty stomach, as
he wiped his sword on the grass and put it back into its sheath” (Tolkien 193).
In the end, Spiders are like any other monster in Middle Earth: they are
fantasy monsters that both protagonists and readers must be courageous enough
to face head-on.
-TL
3 comments:
I think you are closest to the mystery that is Shelob when you note that she does not care about the Ring at all. All of the other characters are obsessed with it, but to her it is a matter of massive indifference. This makes her more terrifying, as you point out, because *she does not care*! Very nicely observed. RLFB
I like your take on spiders and their place in the narrative, complete with gore and all! I agree that her goals are disjoint from Sauron's goals of domination and the ring, but there is a symbiotic relationship at play: Shelob protects the boundaries of Mordor for Sauron, and Sauron's forces and enemies provide prey for Shelob. To use OH's terminology, there is a connection between villains and monsters. Let's explain.
As a recap, OH defines villains as beings that are corrupted by evil, whereas monsters are beings that are inherently evil. For example, Sauron is a villain since he was corrupted by Morgoth, and Shelob is a monster since she, as you point out, is not interested in Sauron's corrupted version of evil, only desiring to capture prey to feed herself. Their relationship has two directions, which we will analyze separately.
Shelob helping Sauron by protecting his lands shows fundamental evil serving corrupt evil, which is slightly counterintuitive since she has no desire to serve Sauron directly. This is not a problem, however, since Shelob is not feasting on prey for Sauron's benefit, so it is a case of shared goals and mutual interest. Both Sauron and Shelob want Shelob to eat anyone who comes in that cave, and Shelob is happy to oblige regardless of Sauron's interest.
Sauron helping Shelob by providing her food is slightly harder to analyze. We see corrupt evil in servitude of fundamental evil, which makes sense on a surface level, since villainous evil is an imperfect copy of the platonic evil seen in monsters. And while Sauron feeding his enemies to Shelob makes sense for both parties, Sauron feeding some of his forces to Shelob (incidentally or otherwise) is more interesting, since by losing members of his forces, Sauron is actively taking steps in the opposite direction of where he wants to be going for the purpose of appeasing Shelob. This shows Sauron making sacrifices for Shelob, and while sometimes this is to be rid of delinquent soldiers, delinquent soldiers are better than no soldiers, meaning Sauron is detracting from his goals in order to preserve and benefit Shelob.
-Calder (BC4)
I really enjoyed your concluding note, that Bilbo grows through his battle with the spiders, and each of us may grow by addressing our childhood fears. I expect Tolkien's dismissal of the tarantula in Bloemfontein comes from his overall dislike of psychological or reductive theories, the kind of amateur Freudianism that would "explain away" motifs and ideas. Is Tolkien right to find psychological theories distracting from literary appreciation?
I do think there's a lot more to be said about Shelob and spider-kind more generally. Not only does she not serve Sauron and is indifferent to the ring, but her foremother (it seems significant that the spiders we know about are all female) actively tried to devour Morgoth, the progenitor of evil himself.
The point Calder brings up about the Sauron-Shelob relationship is very interesting. To the extent that Sauron represents corrupt evil and Shelob fundamental evil, why think that Sauron's evil is therefore lesser? If the corruption of the best is the worst, Sauron's greater ambitions and intellect make him capable of much worse. Perhaps his willingness to have her eat a few of his soldiers is therefore a calculated risk to obtain a better defense, or perhaps it is just sadism.
~LJF
Post a Comment