Wednesday, May 24, 2023

Nature's Immersion

The thing about Tolkien’s nature is how interesting he makes it. It’s hard to write about nature, about the trees and grass and flora and fauna that make up the basic setting of almost every book, of almost every life out there, solely because it doesn’t normally do much. Nature, sure, is living, but it doesn’t really act upon us. It’s passive, especially in books, where it only appears to be traversed. And Tolkien subverts this in a few ways, most prominently by making the nature not passive – if anything, aggressive. We see this throughout the trilogy, most notably in the Old Forest, where the trees themselves come to life. Beginning of course with foreboding feelings – as “the trees became taller, darker, and thicker… they all got an uncomfortable feeling that they were being watched with disapproval, deepening to dislike and even enmity…” (LotR, pg. 111), the hobbits’ passage through the Old Forest peaks with an attack from Old Man Willow himself, who, as he attempted to trap the hobbits, “set up ripples of anger that ran out over the whole Forest” (pg. 118), even as the hobbits fought with the forest itself.

It's one of the great things about fantasy, the ability to bring the environment to life around the characters, creating a world that is not only more immersive for the readers, but also more immersive for the characters themselves. We talked in class about how the Hobbits themselves are isolated and shut off from much of the world, so as they learn about it, so too does the reader. And nowhere is this more clear than in their experiences with nature, with their surroundings. Not only the Old Forest, as discussed above, but every biome is populated by a variety of highly-intelligent species, from dwarves to elves to orcs, even to dragons such as Smaug, and as will be discussed below, ents.

And it’s clear that part of what allowed Tolkien to write like this was his understanding of nature, his ability to view it as truly alive. It’s seen across his writing – for example, in Letter 241 in The Letters of JRR Tolkien, he writes of a tree that “had gallantly grown new limbs – though of course not with the unblemished grace of its former natural self,” personifying this plant, this tree, that so many wouldn’t have looked twice at. This ability to see each tree as unique, as something interesting in and of itself, is how Tolkien is able to create such diversity from consistently similar backdrops. Across the forests of Middle-Earth, each one is treated differently, is written about differently – “Lothlórien is beautiful… the Old Forest was hostile… Fangorn Forest was old and beautiful, but at the time of the story tense with hostility… Kirkwood had fallen under the domination of a Power…” (Letters, Letter 339).

And this sentiment of Tolkien’s is of course backed by his own writing – the Old Forest, as discussed above, Lothlorien, with “no trees like the trees of that land. For in the autumn their leaves fall not, but turn to gold… the floor of the wood is golden, and golden is the roof, and its pillars are of silver, for the bark of the trees is smooth and grey” (LotR, pg. 335); Fangorn forest originally described as “untidy… most of the trees seem to be half covered with ragged dry leaves that have never fallen…” yet full of “the old feeling of this wood” (LotR, pg. 461), before meeting Treebeard.

Of course, the ents are Tolkien’s clearest version of nature itself truly coming to life, and you can see plenty of Tolkien’s love of nature bleeding through the book in some of these passages – for example, on page 475, Treebeard tells “rather a strange and sad story,” beginning when “the world was young, and the woods were wide and wild...”. This consistent portrayal of nature as this untamable force separate from humanity, or other similar species such as elves and dwarves, is key to what makes his work great, introducing the complexity of another player in every scene – the backdrop itself – while adding uniqueness to every setting, making every forest that is traveled through different – and, of course, the constant emphasizing of protecting nature is an amazing byproduct. Through this pattern, Tolkien creates a world that is both beautiful and immersive, mixing the best pieces of fantasy with bits of the real world and the beauty it contains. 

-MR

3 comments:

Fencing Bear said...

It is hard not to wax poetic when talking about Tolkien's love of trees! I would have liked to hear more in detail about the Ents, particularly Treebeard, as representatives of "nature." Why do we think of Treebeard as separate from the other characters and how? I talked in class about the way Tolkien is using the "chain of Being" as a structure on which to build his world. What does thinking about "nature" in this relationship with other creatures show us that the simple binary "nature vs. humankind" obscures? RLFB

Unknown said...

I agree it is sometimes hard to write about nature because of how basic it is, but as you say, this is exactly why Tolkien believes in the importance of nature – it represents the inherent beauty and balance that gets disrupted when forces of evil strike against it with envy and greed. Nature in the Lord of the Rings is pure and wholesome, just as the hobbits are in the Shire, away from the corrupting forces of evil, but the dark designs of man seek to disrupt this natural harmony. I am reminded of the destruction of Fangorn Forest by Saruman, who cuts down many of the Ents in his quest for power and domination. The evil in this annihilation of pure, natural beauty is echoed by Tolkien in the lines in Mythopoeia: “I will not walk with your progressive apes, erect and sapient. Before them gapes the dark abyss to which their progress tends.” Tolkien is wise to criticize this ever-forward-looking proclivity of man, who often tends to uproot innocent parts of nature in its wake. Tolkien’s defense of nature in Lord of the Rings points to a larger point about creation; it must be respected and defended. What is good is natural, which is why you see an evil place like Mordor void of any vegetation – it is desolate and barren, a reflection of the character of those who seek to pervert nature in search of power. - ACLL

Unknown said...

I agree with you that it can be very hard to make nature interesting, and Tolkien is able to overcome that some of the time. As you say he personifies nature, and not in the metaphorical sense, but in the literal sense, making them walking and talking things. I also think he has a great appreciation for nature, and it adds depth to the story. Even when not talking about nature that is personified, he goes into depth about certain aspects, and it helps the reader truly visualize the situation, and feel like they are in Middle Earth. Quite frankly his in depth descriptions are part of what makes it so easy for avid readers to pick on the creators of the films and television shows that take place in the universe. Tolkien does such a great job getting the reader to visualize what is going on that if the sub-creators take too many liberties with their decisions, or are unable to achieve visually what Tolkien was able to put into words then some people get upset at the sub-creators for their attempts.
-RL