During our discussion about the
Music of Creation, we spent a great deal of time considering the roles played
by Eru Ilúvatar and the “offspring of his thought,” [1] the Ainur during the
creation of Arda. Tolkien altered the details of this creation over the course
of many drafts of the Ainulindalë: In an early draft (The ‘B’ Draft cited in
HME 10), the world is given being by Eru as the Ainur sing, but in subsequent
drafts and the final version of the Silmarillion, the Ainur are shown a vision
of their song, and then sent to create it. Tolkien also appeared to struggle
with how much characterization to give the Valar during the creation story—in
some drafts, their characteristics and relationships are included in the
Ainulindalë, while in other drafts these details are missing, or moved to a
separate section dealing with the Valar more specifically. To me, this shows a
fluctuating conception of just how much autonomy, ability, and importance the
Ainur have in Eru’s grand scheme: Are they the key players, worthy of a
biography in the creation story? Do they create the world by their song, or
with their (metaphorical) hands? Just how much independence do they truly have
from the theme of Eru?
In order to gain a bit of traction
on these questions, it may be beneficial to instead find a passage that remains
constant throughout decades of editing to use as a sort of constant bedrock,
even if other details (and therefore interpretations) vary. A passage which survives almost intact from
the Ainulindalë in HME 5, HME 10, and the Silmarillion concerns Eru’s
instruction to the Ainur near the very beginning of the legend. At the
beginning of The Music of the Ainur, the Ainur sing by themselves or in small
harmonic groups until Ilúvatar shows them a great theme of his own creation,
asking the Ainur that they “make in harmony together a Great Music. And since I
have kindled you with the Flame Imperishable, ye shall show for the your powers
in adorning this theme, each with his own thoughts and devices…” [1] And indeed
they do, and in every draft their voices are likened to musical instruments,
choirs, and the harmony is described as growing more and more beautiful and
complex until the Ainu Melkor begins to strive for mastery of the music.
In class, we attempted to gain insight
into this passage and the process of deepening harmony by listening to music by
Holst, Beethoven, and Smetana. While this
music provided a good jumping-off point for picturing the complexity of
the Music of Creation, it doesn’t quite take into account the agency the Ainur
seem to possess in shaping their own songs, as each piece we heard is a work
created by one man, with notation to be adhered to by later interpreters. One
metaphor which incorporates the Ainur’s “thoughts and devices” into the symphonic
metaphor, is to relate this conserved passage, and later passages relating the
tasteless machinations of Melkor, to any musical concerto I’ve ever had the
pleasure (or on occasion, frustration) of accompanying, presenting, or hearing.
Very simply, a concerto often
proceeds in the following way: The whole orchestra will introduce a primary
theme, before fading to allow a soloist to take up the theme in their own
voice, supported by the rest of the group, not unlike Eru’s presentation of the
Great Theme to the Ainur. While the soloist begins very near in character to
the original, it does tend to develop and grow more complicated in its own
right as well as in its relation to the rest of the orchestra as the concerto
progresses—much like each individual Ainu gains familiarity with the others and
slowly deepens their singing. Perhaps the most crucial part of the concerto,
however, falls near the end at the cadenza, where the soloist plays a section
without accompaniment—and indeed often without any specific music at all.
A cadenza is a sort of
“subcomposition” rarely written out on the page for the convenience of the
soloist. It may be vaguely sketched and the composer may offer a few
suggestions, but it remains a minute or two of music that is the responsibility
of the soloist alone. While a soloist can certainly adopt someone else’s
cadenza and replicate it, the proper procedure is to compose your own, drawing
upon your knowledge of the theme, the structure and arc of the concerto as a
whole, the composer’s intent and your own creativity. Not surprisingly, an
enormous variation in character and quality occurs in this section. Indeed,
some cadenzas (unfortunately, including many of my own early efforts) are
positively Melkorian: they are unsubtle, clash with the style of the rest of
the piece, embellish the theme in only a rote fashion, or wander so far away
from the theme that the audience (and perhaps the accompanying orchestra) is
left wondering just what happened. The cadenza usually makes or breaks a performance:
A superior soloist will somehow make the composer’s work something entirely new
and fascinating, but a tactless one will effectively ruin the music that had
been previously constructed by soloist and orchestra.
The same creative process found in
the construction of a cadenza, in which a unique player takes on the
responsibility of combining the theme with one’s own creativity (to good and
ill) is also on display during the song of the Ainur. Each Ainu is charged with
embellishing Eru’s theme to their own taste whilst remaining true
to the whole. Melkor halts the Music
and confuses his fellow singers with his violent compositions, their own songs
“foundered in a sea of turbulent sound” until Ilúvatar silences the raging
storm with a wave of his hand before starting another theme anew. If we take
the liberty of a few noun changes, this section perfectly depicts an orchestra
falling apart at the seams before being pulled together by the conductor has
been written, I have not read it.
So if we are to look at the
passages in which the Ainur sing together through the lens of an orchestra
performance, two roles for Eru appear, and two roles for the Ainur as well. As
the creator of the original theme and as someone who salvages the chaos of a
failed subcomposition, Eru is both composer and conductor of the music of the
Ainur. The Ainur create their own subcompositions with the guidance of the rest
of the work, but they also act as choir and orchestra as they blend their own
voices with those of the others. Obviously the metaphor is not an exact one:
Every Ainu cadenzas and embellishes and creates simultaneously, which in an orchestral context would play out as an
entire orchestra of subcomposing soloists. Even the most skilled improvisational
jazz combos fall far short of achieving this feat, but the fact that this chaos
appears to be what the Ainur are intended to do says something very important
about the abilities and role of Eru.
For a long while, “Ilúvatar sat and
hearkened, and for a great while it seemed good to him, for in the music there
were no flaws.” [1] How is it holding together? In the orchestral metaphor,
there are a few routes which can be employed, besides simply listening to one’s
neighbor. First, one can latch on to the composer and adhere carefully to the
notes printed on the page. But we’ve already seen that this is insufficient for
an approximation of the Ainulindalë—the Ainur are not adhering to a prewritten
scheme, but rather forging their own from the great Theme. Another option for
keeping the music together is to submit to the guidance of the conductor, who
can maintain communication with each member of the orchestra and guide the
various voices as they execute the piece. However, this too seems to be
insufficient, as much of the time Eru is a step removed from the Music, and he
is not seen in these passages as directly influencing one Ainu or another’s
sound. Neither the role of Composer nor Conductor fully describe Ilúvatar.
That this metaphor isn’t wholly
satisfying is hardly surprising. Flieger addresses the challenge of describing
the complex creative process and the participants of the Ainulindalë by
describing the Ainur as powerful “demiurgic” creators of the world but also as
splinters of Eru, the One[2]. This is crucial—how can one describe or begin to
understand a being who encompasses everything? One answer is to do as humans do
when confronted with things beyond their comprehension, which is to break it
down into the comprehensible, much as Eru is imperfectly represented in the
physical world by the Valar, who have readily-definable characteristics and
personalities. Flieger employs the metaphor of a pure white light, broken by a
prism into specific colors that are sharper and easier to comprehend than the
enormity of the White whole of Eru. The metaphor of a concerto performance
functions in a similar way. Undoubtedly, it is flawed, but it offers an avenue
for comprehension of the subcreative power of the Ainur that also takes into
account their reliance upon Eru.
A concerto is just one of
infinitely many metaphors we could dream up for the Music of Creation, which,
though none (not even Christian creation myth, as we discussed in class) are
sufficient to fully explain the Ainulindalë, I submit is not a fruitless
enterprise. The account of Pengolod in HME 10 makes me wonder if the accounts
of singing the world into being aren’t an example of elvish thinkers who create metaphors attempting to make sense of
the enormity of the formation of Arda. To generate our own lenses through which
to peer at the design of Eru is to perhaps embroider the story a bit ourselves
in the hopes of understanding the whole, which only draws us deeper into the
secondary reality of Tolkien’s world.
[1] JRR Tolkien, The Silmarillion
[2] Verlyn Flieger, Splintered
Light
-KAM
3 comments:
This is the best description I have ever read of what Tolkien seems to be describing in the Music of the Ainur! --RLFB
This post was really lovely, and as a fellow musician who has also played many concertos I thought your comparisons between the Ainulindalë and the composition/conducting of a concerto were excellent. I completely agree that a composer’s cadenza will never turn out the way he/she expects it to, and comparing a songs cadenza to the task of the Ainur definitely was a clear way to describe creation through music.
I’d like to bring up the idea of free will and allowing the Ainur free will, especially in the case of creation. As we have read, allowing messengers to go on their own with their own instructions does not always have positive effects, just as you explained with the Ainu Melkor. When I read that comment, all I could think of was a soloist performing in a grand hall and playing all the wrong notes of a piece, but on purpose if only to take away power from the conductor. Most often we know this is not the case and the soloist just forgot the notes. If that should happen, one wonders what the conductor would do. Most likely try to continue with piece, just as Eru attempted to introduce new themes into the music of creation to overtake Melkor’s theme. But just as you pointed out, Iluvatar is not the conductor, but more the composer, and just like the composer Iluvatar can only attempt to control the players, but giving such power and free will to the messengers can result in catastrophe. Great metaphor!
E.Q.
Echoing what others have said, this was an excellent post. It's been difficult to craft a response, as I've been too busy listening to concerto's since I've read it. I'm especially interested in your grappling with how to place Eru within this metaphor of a concerto. When you say that Eru seems a step too removed from the actual progression of the music to be regarded as a conductor, I had the impulse to assert the exact opposite. To my eyes, Eru seems almost too deeply intertwined with the music to be considered a conductor or a composer. I think especially of the Third Theme, and the sort of swelling upwards of the music (forgive my inexactness in musical terminology) when Eru finally completes the theme and ends the discord of Melkor. The music seems to be not simply a reflection of Eru's plan but a fundamental reflection of who Eru *is*. It may be that I'm simply importing too much medieval philosophy, however, either way it's simply one of the extremely interesting aspects of the Ainulindale that you touch on, and I think your understanding here is a great way to help plumb these.
Post a Comment