Our
discussion on Monday led to some interesting conclusions about how and why
Tolkien describes trees in the manner that he does in his many works. Trees,
for Tolkien, are not just living creatures in the way that we think of them in
our own primary reality. Rather, they are sentient with memories of past good
and evil deeds that influence their manner and behavior, much like all the
other peoples of Middle Earth. In seeing this comparison, we began to discuss
whether the clash between Saruman and the Ents was really just a clash between
industry and “the wild” but quickly realized that it actually has more to do
with the clash of cultures and civilizations. It was this vein of thought that
led me to think more about the manner in which Tolkien characterizes
interaction between individuals in LotR and trees and how representative it can
be of who these individuals are in the context of Good and Evil.
Galadriel,
among all other beings on Middle Earth, is probably the ideal example of a tree
lover. She uses her power to imbue Lothlorien
with her love for nature, making the Golden Woods shine and thrive in a manner
that is different from all other forests in Middle Earth. At the same time, she
is also the wisest and fairest. As we have quickly discovered, Tolkien does [not] write or include anything in his works that is coincidental. In being this
supreme and wise individual from the Elder Days, Galadriel understands the
trees in a manner that few others on Middle Earth do because in a sense, she
embodies the very thing that trees represent: fairness, beauty, wisdom, age and
light. In Tolkien’s description of Lorien and Galadriel (LotR, Book II, Chapter 6 & 7), there seems to be a kind of flow
between the two living beings such that both are imbued with a power and light
that can be both frightening and nurturing. Upon her leaving, the woods of
Lorien start fading, just as she fades into the West. There is a deep
connection between the Lady of the Wood and her trees which is what marks her
as one of the most supreme and powerful beings on Middle Earth in its fight
against Evil.
It would
only be right, then, to talk about Samwise Gamgee next. Arguably the most
“good” character of the Lord of the Rings Samwise is, of all the ring bearers,
the only one that does not succumb to the power of the ring. Galadriel herself
refers to Sam as “little gardener and lover of trees” (LotR, Book II, Chapter 8) before gifting him the earth from her
own land. This is an incredibly significant exchange because it is more than
just a gift, but rather a passing on of a similar power and love of cultivation
to one who she deems worthy of it. She describes how the garden that blooms may
give Sam a view of “far off Lorien”. Sam is the one that supports Frodo through
most of his travails and is the one that restores the Shire (LotR, Book VI, Chapter 9) to its
original, if not greater beauty. Like Galadriel, Sam cultivates and loves
nature in a manner that is different from the other Hobbits. His love for
gardens and well maintained greenery is central to his character. While it is not
the “wild” mysticism and power associated with the Golden Woods, it is his caring
for things that bloom and grow that play a part in making Sam a symbol of hope and
good much more so than many other characters in the Lord of the Rings.
However,
this idea is not complete without referencing the other side of this coin. In
Tolkien’s verse, Melkor, Saruman and Sauron are synonymous with darkness, ash
and fire: all things that are evil and dangerous for trees. There are constant
descriptions of smoke and fire rising from Mordor and Isengard with trees being
cut down to feed these fires. Saruman, a wizard who seemingly loved nature and
trees, is described by Treebeard to have a mind of “stone”(LotR, Book III, Chapter 4) while Sauron, in his lair in Dol Goldur,
not only corrupted Mirkwood making it dark and dangerous, but also decimated Mordor
into a barren land with fire and ash.
Melkor, possibly most evil, or at least the original evil being in
Tolkien’s verse, stabbed and killed the Two Trees in Varda, beginning the cycle
of war, loss and darkness that was the battle and quest for the Silmarils (Quenta Silmarillion). It is clear, in
these descriptions, that Tolkien is condemning these individuals as evil, not
because of some inherent bad quality in them, but because of their actions,
particularly against the living beings of Middle Earth, including the trees.
The paths of destruction and carnage that these three representations of evil
leave in their wake remind me of Tolkien’s anger in his letter to the editor of
the Daily Telegraph. He states that “nothing… compares with the destruction,
torture and murder of trees perpetrated by private individuals and minor
official bodies. The savage sound of the electric saw is never silent wherever
trees are still found growing” (Letter
339). In Middle Earth, it is not electric saws but axes that emphasize the
darkness and evil of Sauron, Saruman and Melkor in their individual quests for
power over good.
Tolkien
does a wonderful job in showing a culmination of this idea in the march of the
Ents against Isengard (Book III, Chapter
4). It isn’t a “hasty” decision but rather one that is thought out and
discussed by the Ents. It might not be the most significant fight between the
forces of good and evil in the Lord of the Rings, but it is certainly
important, just in the fact that it is the primary example of nature’s
civilization fighting back. The Ents, the tree-shepherds, march to war much
like Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas march to war. Though not necessarily rooted in
the same motivations, the cause for both these forces of good is the same: to
overcome to darkness and evil that Sauron and Saruman have wrought on Middle
Earth. In both cases, it is a clash of civilizations and cultures and different
beliefs. Though this “last march of the Ents” could mean a potential end to
cultivation of forests that are known and loved, it also represents the
inevitable end of the dominion of the destroyers of nature. Treebeard is not
fighting on behalf of Aragorn and Gandalf, but he is fighting the same enemy.
So whether we categorize dark forces as a tree cutter or an Orc, Tolkien has
crafted an epic where the civilizations and balance of good and evil in them is
very carefully and purposefully interwoven with nature.
AK
2 comments:
Dear AK,
I think you put your finger on something of key importance: the correlation between characters’ treatment of trees and their general moral quality. The examples you give are compelling and well-spotted.
I wonder, though, how far can one push this point. What are the limits to the correlation between a cultivating appreciation of growing things and a higher moral quality? Could one extend your argument to make it a kind of test or tell-tale of character? If we do press it that far, I wonder how one would deal with the possibility of dark or evil trees. Where would the Bucklanders fit here, those who chopped down the trees beseiging their village?
I think you’re well developing the theme of ‘nature’s civilization’ (lovely, paradoxical phrase). If we find the tree having consciousness and memories, do we also find them with free agency and the power of choice? If so, we come back to our theme of the character of evil (especially the Ring) as controlling others’ wills. What kind of model does Treebeard the tree-herd provide in his care for the trees without depotism?
~Robert
I very much agree with your observations in this post concerning the thematic parallels between goodness and nature. I wonder why Tolkien chose to stress this connection so strongly. Are the trees something that are inherently good and righteous, more so than other beings? Or rather, do they stand for something? The trees seem to be a symbol of life, specifically life that is beautiful, but defenseless. The trees are much like the hobbits or human villagers of Middle Earth in that they cannot alone stand up to the evil and darkness of Sauron and his armies. As you pointed out, the same characters who care so strongly for nature also embody mercy, empathy, and compassion. These connections are definitely important to Tolkien and add a lot to the understanding of what it means to be “good”.
-KM
Post a Comment